Questo sito utilizza cookie di profilazione (propri e di terze parti) per ottimizzare la tua esperienza online e per inviarti pubblicità in linea con le tue preferenze. Continuando a utilizzare questo sito senza modificare le tue preferenze acconsenti all’uso dei cookie. Se vuoi saperne di più o negare il consenso a tutti o ad alcuni cookie clicca qui>
The website that you are visiting also provides Arabian language. Do you wish to switch language version?
يوفر موقع الويب الذي تزوره المحتوى باللغة العربية أيضًا. هل ترغب في تبديل إصدار اللغة؟
The website that you are visiting also provides Russia language Do you wish to switch language version?
Данный сайт есть в английской версии. Желаете ли Вы перейти на английскую версию?
At a certain office, all the optical modules on the live network pass the sensitivity test during NE-level hardware acceptance. During the system acceptance, however, it is found that a great number of optical modules on the TOM board work abnormally. The fault symptoms are as follows:
1. GE module: When a self loopback is configured, the system reports R_LOS and the received power is displayed as �60 dBm.
There are two criteria for inspecting an optical module: loss of signal (LOS) and loss of power (LOP). LOS is used to check whether optical power is present. If certain optical power is present, LOS is not reported. LOP is used to check whether signals exist. No LOS is reported when a service is configured. There is no unified regulation for these two criteria in the industry. Optical module suppliers have not unified the methods of inspecting optical modules.During NE hardware acceptance, a service is added to the NE in the sensitivity test by using a test instrument. Therefore, the problem is not found in the test. However, when a self loopback is configured on the NE, there is only white light but not service light on the optical port. Thus, even if the system detects optical power, it reports LOS.