Questo sito utilizza cookie di profilazione (propri e di terze parti) per ottimizzare la tua esperienza online e per inviarti pubblicità in linea con le tue preferenze. Continuando a utilizzare questo sito senza modificare le tue preferenze acconsenti all’uso dei cookie. Se vuoi saperne di più o negare il consenso a tutti o ad alcuni cookie clicca qui>
The website that you are visiting also provides Arabian language. Do you wish to switch language version?
يوفر موقع الويب الذي تزوره المحتوى باللغة العربية أيضًا. هل ترغب في تبديل إصدار اللغة؟
The website that you are visiting also provides Russia language Do you wish to switch language version?
Данный сайт есть в английской версии. Желаете ли Вы перейти на английскую версию?
Customer reported that there were packets loss and services impact in the network,Topology below:
1.According to the customer feedback, there were some packets loss when a wireless user(ip: 10.44.96.168) ping its gateway (CORE-01).
Check the information of switch CORE-01, we found that the ARP of 0.44.96.168 should learn from Eth-trunk 30. But sometimes they'll learn Eth-trunk1, in this case, this core switch will send packets to peer which connect to Eth-trunk 30, and will not respond to the user, so it caused packets loss.The network is stable in normal scenario, The ARP should learn from a fixed port. However from the ARP track information , we found that a large number of ARP ever learn Eth-trunk1, we suspect there was a loop or shock in the network.
2.Check the log information of CORE-01 device,
we found that there were MAC flapping under Vlan 1, and all the flapping port is relation with Eth-trunk1, so we can deduced that the packets were loopback form Eth-trunk 1, it need check the peer device named CORE-02.
3.Check the log of CORE-02 switch, we also found that all the flapping port were relation with G1/0/47.
According the current information, the packets which caused the MAC flapping were loopback by the port G1/0/47, there was a loop under G1/0/47, it must check the peer device which connect to G1/0/47.
4.The port description of GE1/0/47 is BH-02 shows that it connects to a device named BH-02, and this port added Vlan 1.
The device named BH-02 is a router. The switch connect to many office site in different place with L2VPN which deployed on the router BH-02. Each Office are isolated, there was no loop between them. We can deduced there was a loop under one site.
Because the port of LSW is added Vlan 1 default. A loop under one site was the most possible when the office site has wrong connect. It need to check the office site by customer.
The flapping and loop diagram：